Quote:
sdy284 said:
great! What method did you use to collect this data? Was this on a dyno or some sort of software on a laptop?
Quote:
Oxonian said:
Randy: did you ever test before installing Speedart Performance kit-1? What was the result?
Quote:
vtach88 said:
I think that is a rolling start? The clock (bold vertical line) started when you were already moving. Or am I misreading the graph?
According to the graph, it should be 5.3 seconds from 0-60?
Quote:
vtach88 said:
I think that is a rolling start? The clock (bold vertical line) started when you were already moving. Or am I misreading the graph?
According to the graph, it should be 5.3 seconds from 0-60?
Quote:
ADias said:Quote:
vtach88 said:
I think that is a rolling start? The clock (bold vertical line) started when you were already moving. Or am I misreading the graph?
According to the graph, it should be 5.3 seconds from 0-60?
I agree. The actual time from a stopped start is 5.388s.
I think that that extra second is the effect of the torque converter. After that the tip is fine as the torque converter does not play a role in intermediate shifting. In practice, once the car is rolling, the tip may be faster than even the fastest driver operating a 6-speed manual, or at least the average driver.
Quote:
I would like to see the article of the M6 against the 996 turbo...timing 0-60 0-80 0-100. I posted what was in the Road & Track.
Quote:
ADias said:
In practice, once the car is rolling, the tip may be faster than even the fastest driver operating a 6-speed manual, or at least the average driver.
Feb 2, 2006 2:42:08 PM
Mar 9, 2006 11:58:26 AM