The winner of this comparison is the...918. Incredible performance for a car which is 11(!) years old. Ferrari and especially Lamborghini should be ashamed.
RC (Germany) - Rennteam Editor Lamborghini Huracan Performante (2019), BMW Z4 M40i (2022), Jeep Grand Cherokee Trackhawk (2019 EU)
Rossi:Disappointing result for the new Bull.
The worst part is: The new and cheaper 296 is actually a tiny bit faster than the SF90. Also sounds great.
RC (Germany) - Rennteam Editor Lamborghini Huracan Performante (2019), BMW Z4 M40i (2022), Jeep Grand Cherokee Trackhawk (2019 EU)
So NA + Lambo hybrid torque fill < TT + Ferrari hybrid torque fill.
Does Lambo need better hybrid software engineers, or is this a fundamental limitation of NA torque vs TT torque at launch and higher RPM?
I still think Carwow should weigh all 3 cars and all 3 drivers, and show the accelerometer data for the run once the true total masses are known. In this way we could gain real insight into who is creating engineering value for your money. But this is YouTube theatre, not serious journalism…
911tts:And I have one on order (Revuelto) :(((
You will still enjoy it, believe me.
The SF90 had(has?) often hybrid system issues and it is only faster at VERY high speeds.
In the lower speed range, the Revuelto rocks and the sound is amazing.
I'd get a 296 instead of the SF90 anyway if I'd have to choose. The 296 is amazingly fast, basically a bargain and sounds great. It is also a very "compact" car, even suitable as a daily driver.
--
RC (Germany) - Rennteam Editor Lamborghini Huracan Performante (2019), BMW Z4 M40i (2022), Jeep Grand Cherokee Trackhawk (2019 EU)