Quote:
NM said:
RR4 - i hope that's true and they ditch the GT2 as a range topping model. I've always felt they should have a mid-engined supercar as a range topper. Something in the vain of the CGT, but a permanent model costing between Pounds150K- Pounds200k. Now that would be amazing.....
Quote:
BC997J said:Quote:
NM said:
RR4 - i hope that's true and they ditch the GT2 as a range topping model. I've always felt they should have a mid-engined supercar as a range topper. Something in the vain of the CGT, but a permanent model costing between Pounds150K- Pounds200k. Now that would be amazing.....
No, No, No... All 911's should ALWAYS be rear-engined. Its the cars trademark and gives the cars a very special feel...
Quote:
NM said:Quote:
BC997J said:Quote:
NM said:
RR4 - i hope that's true and they ditch the GT2 as a range topping model. I've always felt they should have a mid-engined supercar as a range topper. Something in the vain of the CGT, but a permanent model costing between Pounds150K- Pounds200k. Now that would be amazing.....
No, No, No... All 911's should ALWAYS be rear-engined. Its the cars trademark and gives the cars a very special feel...
I was suggesting another model range, as opposed to building a mid-engined 911. If the turbo has over 500bhp (as rumoured) this will be more than enough power for most 911 drivers. This would permit a permanent mid-engined supercar with 550 - 600 BHP to exist alongside the 911, for those who want something truely insane.