Crown

Forum - Thread


    Autocars 0-100-0 challenge

    here are the following times..ill list the 0-60,then the 0-100 then the 0-100-0 time


    Ford Gt 3.93,8.59,13.17

    DB9 Manual 4.62,10.24,14.92

    c6 corvette 4.62,10.8,15.32

    Noble m400 3.72,8.8,13.51

    M5 4.69,9.71,14.16

    MItsubishi evo 9 4.23,10.73,15.15

    porsche carrera S 4.52,10.42,15.39

    silly cars...

    Ariel Atom supercharge 3.15,6.86,10.88

    Caterham 260 3.27,7.55,11.41

    BIke..Suzuki GSX r1000 3.18,5.63,10.82

    Re: Autocars 0-100-0 challenge

    omg that ariel atom is fast! it is almost head to head with the GSX-R!!

    i'm glad to see the noble is 3rd in the list (how's that for a "kit car" for those who don't really like it?)

    Re: Autocars 0-100-0 challenge

    I don't know about you, but I like those "silly cars"

    Sort of embarassing that the 997S loses to the EVO that costs 1/3 as much (they handle well too).

    Re: Autocars 0-100-0 challenge

    Quote:
    Grant said:
    I don't know about you, but I like those "silly cars"

    Sort of embarassing that the 997S loses to the EVO that costs 1/3 as much (they handle well too).



    The real stunner is the 4000lb. M5 beating the 911S in the braking department!

    Re: Autocars 0-100-0 challenge

    Actually, the 997S had one of the worst braking times on the list (surprising with the good weight distribution).

    Re: Autocars 0-100-0 challenge

    For comparison, the Ultima GTr does 0-100-0 in 10.3secs:

    http://www.ultimasports.co.uk/record.html

    Re: Autocars 0-100-0 challenge

    Is that the full list? they usually get a few more high end cars

    Re: Autocars 0-100-0 challenge

    And a stock Gixxer beats them all!

    I find the 997S braking times strange since thats the 997S' strong part, the 997S brakes in shorter distance than a previous 996TT for example... and you know 100% sure there is something wrong when it doesn't beat a 1800kg front engined sedan in stopping distance, its a matter of simple physics.

    Re: Autocars 0-100-0 challenge

    Actually Ulitma recently broke their own record with a new 9.8 second run.

    http://www.ultimasports.co.uk/newrecord.html

    Re: Autocars 0-100-0 challenge

    Quote:
    Carlos from Spain said:
    And a stock Gixxer beats them all!

    I find the 997S braking times strange since thats the 997S' strong part, the 997S brakes in shorter distance than a previous 996TT for example...


    In a previous test, the 997S beat the CGT in braking distance

    Re: Autocars 0-100-0 challenge

    Quote:
    Grant said:
    Actually, the 997S had one of the worst braking times on the list (surprising with the good weight distribution).



    Are carbon brakes standard on the S? If not, that may explain the difference.

    Re: Autocars 0-100-0 challenge

    Quote:
    nberry said:
    Quote:
    Grant said:
    Actually, the 997S had one of the worst braking times on the list (surprising with the good weight distribution).



    Are carbon brakes standard on the S? If not, that may explain the difference.



    They are not.Porsche offers PCCB - Porsche ceramic brakes
    as a 8K option.

    The BMW might out brake it, but not for too many times!


    Re: Autocars 0-100-0 challenge

    Quote:
    JimFlat6 said:
    The BMW might out brake it, but not for too many times!



    That's exactly right. One stop from 100-0 is not very telling, since the brakes aren't even warm yet (a necessity for some pads to have good friction). Would be interesting if they did 10 tests (both on the acceleration side and braking, since heat soaking negatively affects some motors pretty badly too)

    Re: Autocars 0-100-0 challenge

    Quote:
    nberry said:
    Quote:
    Grant said:
    Actually, the 997S had one of the worst braking times on the list (surprising with the good weight distribution).



    Are carbon brakes standard on the S? If not, that may explain the difference.



    I don't believe it would make much difference in a single stopping disctance test since both brakes (the red Turbo's steel brakes and the PCCB's) are enough to lock the wheels and bite just as hard, the difference between them is the supersior resistance to fade and temperature of the PCCBs compound in prolonged use and diffenrent pedal feel.

    Re: Autocars 0-100-0 challenge

    Quote:
    Carlos from Spain said:
    Quote:
    nberry said:
    Quote:
    Grant said:
    Actually, the 997S had one of the worst braking times on the list (surprising with the good weight distribution).



    Are carbon brakes standard on the S? If not, that may explain the difference.



    I don't believe it would make much difference in a single stopping disctance test since both brakes (the red Turbo's steel brakes and the PCCB's) are enough to lock the wheels and bite just as hard, the difference between them is the supersior resistance to fade and temperature of the PCCBs compound in prolonged use and diffenrent pedal feel.



    PCCB brakes reduce unsprung weight greatly. Which would explain how a PCCB equipped 911 outperformed the CGT in a previous test.

    Re: Autocars 0-100-0 challenge

    The CGT has PCCB's as standard equipment.

    Re: Autocars 0-100-0 challenge

    the noble's brakes are too small IMO! compared to my porsche it must be half the size.. i'll take a pic and show you why i think so if they just put a bit bigger calipers etc. it will outbrake all of them!

    Re: Autocars 0-100-0 challenge

    The Noble is also half the weight of the Porsche so it needs much less brakes, because the problem with larger brakes is that it increases unsprung weight, so excessive brakes can also be unecesarily detrimental to the handling if it doesn't bring a significant braking advantage, if its doesn't need those larger brakes. Do you feel they fade quickily or don't have enough bite?

    Re: Autocars 0-100-0 challenge

    true carlos, but i still think they should've been a "tad"bigger. no fade so far and i've driven the thing pretty hard, but i haven't tracked it yet and that will be the ultimate test for the brakes.

    Re: Autocars 0-100-0 challenge

    Don't forget the variability in time of moving the foot from the throttle to the brake pedal.....

    Re: Autocars 0-100-0 challenge

    Quote:
    Carlos from Spain said:
    The Noble is also half the weight of the Porsche so it needs much less brakes, because the problem with larger brakes is that it increases unsprung weight, so excessive brakes can also be unecesarily detrimental to the handling if it doesn't bring a significant braking advantage.


    Very true. However, the formula for calculating the amount of heat energy that a braking system needs to dissipate is

    Mass x Velocity^2

    So if a car weighs half as much and velocity stays the same, then you only need to dissipate half the heat. But with a car that is half as heavy, you can usually generate much more speed before the braking zone,so this really increases the amount of heat (twice the speed = 4x the heat).

    In general, lighter cars need smaller brakes (and benefit from the reduced unsprung and rotating mass), but don't discount the extra velocity

    Re: Autocars 0-100-0 challenge

    Quote:
    964C2 said:
    Don't forget the variability in time of moving the foot from the throttle to the brake pedal.....



    They use their left foot to brake. But there is still a difference reaction times.. ranges from 0.08 to 0.51 - most of the top cars are in the 0.2-0.4 range

    Re: Autocars 0-100-0 challenge

    Good reminder Grant, the speeds at which the brakes are going to be working depending on the car's perfromance is another factor to take into account as well also, so true.

    Re: Autocars 0-100-0 challenge

    Quote:
    Carlos from Spain said:
    The CGT has PCCB's as standard equipment.



    Yes, it does. And a PCCB equipped 911 has outperformed it in braking distance.

    Re: Autocars 0-100-0 challenge

    Quote:
    Carlos from Spain said:
    And a stock Gixxer beats them all!




    And a four year old F1 car beats the gixxer by four seconds...

    Have you seen the Honda F1, Superbike and Powerboat Challenge video Carlos?

    Re: Autocars 0-100-0 challenge

    Quote:
    svtrader1 said:
    Quote:
    Carlos from Spain said:
    The CGT has PCCB's as standard equipment.



    Yes, it does. And a PCCB equipped 911 has outperformed it in braking distance.



    Thats my point, the fact that the 997S was fitted with PCCB's that have less unsprung weight than the steel stock ones as you mentioned, does not explain why it beat the CGT in braking, since the CGT has the PCCB's as well.

    Re: Autocars 0-100-0 challenge

    Quote:
    Carlos from Spain said:
    Quote:
    svtrader1 said:
    Quote:
    Carlos from Spain said:
    The CGT has PCCB's as standard equipment.



    Yes, it does. And a PCCB equipped 911 has outperformed it in braking distance.



    Thats my point, the fact that the 997S was fitted with PCCB's that have less unsprung weight than the steel stock ones as you mentioned, does not explain why it beat the CGT in braking, since the CGT has the PCCB's as well.



    The 911 has a rear engine, therefore, it has a greater rear weight bias and, thus, it will exhibit less nose dive under hard braking.

    Re: Autocars 0-100-0 challenge

    Quote:
    temm said:
    Quote:
    Carlos from Spain said:
    And a stock Gixxer beats them all!




    And a four year old F1 car beats the gixxer by four seconds...

    Have you seen the Honda F1, Superbike and Powerboat Challenge video Carlos?



    An F1 is a bit out of budget or street-legality here

    I did see the video, unfortunately they chose a V-twin sportbike for the test for some reason instead of a much faster inline-4 still once the F1 is at speed, it will reel in any bike, even a "turboed Busa with a lengthened swing arm" at some point, then again a Formula One car isn't precisely street legal

    Re: Autocars 0-100-0 challenge

    Quote:
    svtrader1 said:
    The 911 has a rear engine, therefore, it has a greater rear weight bias and, thus, it will exhibit less nose dive under hard braking.



    Yep, thats one of the reasons of the legendary 911 braking
    However, the tires are also a great factor in braking distance and the 997S with PCCB's not only beat the CGT with very similar rear weight bias (40-60, though mid-engined) but much wider and specially designed PS2 tires, but also beat the GT3RS with R-compund tires... so still very surprising times for the 997S, at least to me.

    Re: Autocars 0-100-0 challenge

    Quote:
    Carlos from Spain said: However, the tires are also a great factor in braking distance and the 997S with PCCB's not only beat the CGT with very similar rear weight bias (40-60, though mid-engined) but much wider and specially designed PS2 tires, but also beat the GT3RS with R-compund tires... so still very surprising times for the 997S, at least to me.


    I think the GT3RS would've won if its R-tires were up to temperature. R-tires are very slippery until they get hot...

     
    Edit

    Forum

    Categoría Titulo Last post Valoración Visitas Respuestas
    Porsche Sticky SUN'S LAST RUN TO WILSON, WY - 991 C2S CAB LIFE, END OF AN ERA (Part II) 15/05/24 8:44
    art.italy
    808059 1808
    Porsche Sticky Welcome to Rennteam: Cars and Coffee... (photos) 7/04/24 11:48
    Boxster Coupe GTS
    450089 565
    Porsche Sticky OFFICIAL: Porsche 911 (992) GT3 RS - 2022 12/03/24 8:28
    DJM48
    267549 323
    Porsche Sticky The new Macan: the first all-electric SUV from Porsche 30/01/24 9:18
    RCA
    90795 45
    Porsche Sticky OFFICIAL: Taycan 2024 Facelift 15/03/24 13:23
    CGX car nut
    7700 50
    Porsche The moment I've been waiting for... 1/02/24 19:01
    Pilot
     
     
     
     
     
    888102 1364
    Porsche 992 GT3 23/07/23 19:01
    Grant
    836950 3868
    Porsche GT4RS 21/04/24 11:50
    mcdelaug
    402135 1454
    Porsche Welcome to the new Taycan Forum! 10/02/24 16:43
    nberry
    398072 1526
    Otros Tesla 2 the new thread 13/12/23 14:48
    CGX car nut
    385651 2401
    Porsche Donor vehicle for Singer Vehicle Design 3/07/23 12:30
    Porker
    371944 797
    Porsche Red Nipples 991.2 GT3 Touring on tour 12/05/24 18:23
    blueflame
    294381 669
    Porsche Collected my 997 GTS today 19/10/23 19:06
    CGX car nut
     
     
     
     
     
    267948 812
    Lambo Huracán EVO STO 30/07/23 18:59
    mcdelaug
    244720 346
    Lotus Lotus Emira 25/06/23 14:53
    Enmanuel
    239194 101
    Otros Corvette C8 16/10/23 15:24
    Enmanuel
    223145 488
    Otros Gordon Murray - T.50 22/11/23 10:27
    mcdelaug
    173723 387
    Porsche Back to basics - 996 GT3 RS 11/06/23 17:13
    CGX car nut
    145483 144
    BMW M 2024 BMW M3 CS Official Now 29/12/23 9:04
    RCA
    121808 303
    Motorsp. 2023 Formula One 19/12/23 5:38
    WhoopsyM
    113562 685
    Porsche 2022 992 Safari Model 7/03/24 16:22
    WhoopsyM
    86329 239
    AMG Mercedes-Benz W124 500E aka Porsche typ 2758 23/02/24 22:03
    blueflame
    76567 297
    Porsche 992 GT3 RS 3/03/24 19:22
    WhoopsyM
    55539 314
    Motorsp. Porsche 963 18/05/24 21:44
    Wonderbar
    27415 249
    Ferrari Ferrari 296 GTB (830PS, Hybrid V6) 21/01/24 16:29
    GT-Boy
    22235 103
    BMW M 2022 BMW M5 CS 8/04/24 13:43
    Ferdie
    20819 140
    AMG G63 sold out 15/09/23 19:38
    Nico997
    17506 120
    AMG [2022] Mercedes-AMG SL 23/04/24 13:24
    RCA
    15338 225
    Porsche Porsche Mission X Hypercar 3/12/23 8:52
    996FourEss
    11417 63
    Otros An unassuming homologation special - 205 Rallye 31/05/23 12:23
    Enmanuel
    11272 35
    120 elementos encontrados, mostrando 1 de 30.