Crown
Board: AMG Mercedes
Language: English
Region: Worldwide
Close
CloseForum - Thread
But seriously I think the SL is a great car Re: any owner of SL65 here?
Quote:
Mike S said:
the 55 can not compare with the 65, i can really feel the difference between my 55 vs the 65! the traction control on the 65 doesn't turn off until almost 100kmhwith my 55 it stops at around 30-40kmh
Still I feel too young (36yrs) for a SL. Guess image does matter.
Re: any owner of SL65 here?
Quote:
Mike S said:
the 55 can not compare with the 65, i can really feel the difference between my 55 vs the 65! the traction control on the 65 doesn't turn off until almost 100kmh
Still I feel too young (36yrs) for a SL. Guess image does matter.
Jun 11, 2005 4:19:01 PM
- SoCal Alan
- Rennteam VIP
-
- Loc: Orange County , United States
- Posts: 7268, Gallery
- Registered on: Mar 6, 2004
- Reply to: 993Targa
Jun 11, 2005 4:19:01 PM
- SoCal Alan
- Rennteam VIP
-
- Loc: Orange County , United States
- Posts: 7268, Gallery
- Registered on: Mar 6, 2004
- Reply to: 993Targa
Jun 11, 2005 7:34:49 PM
- Bilal
- Expert
-
- Loc: Manchester, UK
- Posts: 1533, Gallery
- Registered on: Jun 20, 2003
- Reply to: SoCal Alan
Re: any owner of SL65 here?
Head over and register at www.mbworld.org, there are a lot of SL65 owners there, (at least 5).
There is absolutely no comparison between the CGT and SL65, they are two totally different cars. How would someone sound when they compare a pair of shoes to a bow tie? The only thing they have in common is HP output.
The CGT trumps the SL65, no sorry, walks the SL65 in every dynamic attribute. Price/comfort and straight line performance is better on the SL65 however. From 0-60mph, the CGT will win with good driver. 0-100mph CGT will also win, however, 0-186mph (I know, stupid) the SL65 is around 3 seconds quicker and top speed of the SL65 is 210mph vs 208mph for the CGT. Totally irrelevant trumps for the SL65, which will probably never be tested by regular buyers, however, you know what they say, even if you don't, its nice to know that you can....
There is absolutely no comparison between the CGT and SL65, they are two totally different cars. How would someone sound when they compare a pair of shoes to a bow tie? The only thing they have in common is HP output.
The CGT trumps the SL65, no sorry, walks the SL65 in every dynamic attribute. Price/comfort and straight line performance is better on the SL65 however. From 0-60mph, the CGT will win with good driver. 0-100mph CGT will also win, however, 0-186mph (I know, stupid) the SL65 is around 3 seconds quicker and top speed of the SL65 is 210mph vs 208mph for the CGT. Totally irrelevant trumps for the SL65, which will probably never be tested by regular buyers, however, you know what they say, even if you don't, its nice to know that you can....
Jun 11, 2005 7:34:49 PM
- Bilal
- Expert
-
- Loc: Manchester, UK
- Posts: 1533, Gallery
- Registered on: Jun 20, 2003
- Reply to: SoCal Alan
Re: any owner of SL65 here?
Head over and register at www.mbworld.org, there are a lot of SL65 owners there, (at least 5).
There is absolutely no comparison between the CGT and SL65, they are two totally different cars. How would someone sound when they compare a pair of shoes to a bow tie? The only thing they have in common is HP output.
The CGT trumps the SL65, no sorry, walks the SL65 in every dynamic attribute. Price/comfort and straight line performance is better on the SL65 however. From 0-60mph, the CGT will win with good driver. 0-100mph CGT will also win, however, 0-186mph (I know, stupid) the SL65 is around 3 seconds quicker and top speed of the SL65 is 210mph vs 208mph for the CGT. Totally irrelevant trumps for the SL65, which will probably never be tested by regular buyers, however, you know what they say, even if you don't, its nice to know that you can....
There is absolutely no comparison between the CGT and SL65, they are two totally different cars. How would someone sound when they compare a pair of shoes to a bow tie? The only thing they have in common is HP output.
The CGT trumps the SL65, no sorry, walks the SL65 in every dynamic attribute. Price/comfort and straight line performance is better on the SL65 however. From 0-60mph, the CGT will win with good driver. 0-100mph CGT will also win, however, 0-186mph (I know, stupid) the SL65 is around 3 seconds quicker and top speed of the SL65 is 210mph vs 208mph for the CGT. Totally irrelevant trumps for the SL65, which will probably never be tested by regular buyers, however, you know what they say, even if you don't, its nice to know that you can....
Re: any owner of SL65 here?
Quote:
Zürich said:Quote:
Mike S said:
what do you mean zurich?!
Guess you age quicker in SA
Wow Mike! You're doing well... all those cars at that age!!! or should I say lack of age!!
How old are you (if you don't mind me asking?). I'm 25, so another 40yrs until I buy a Mercedes!!
Forum
About Rennteam | Help | Terms of use | Privacy Policy | Support | Contact | Imprint | Archive
Powered by
Community
and
