Jun 6, 2005 10:52:07 PM
- Trundle_GT3
- Veteran
- Loc: CA, USA
- Posts: 1016, Gallery
- Registered on: Jun 30, 2003
Jun 6, 2005 10:52:07 PM
Jun 6, 2005 11:31:27 PM
Jun 6, 2005 11:52:18 PM
Quote:
Trundle997S said:
Explains alot....
Jun 7, 2005 7:08:48 AM
Jun 7, 2005 8:23:32 AM
Jun 7, 2005 8:45:58 AM
Quote:
quartermile said:
I witnessed the crash. He was on the brakes the entire time, off the pavement in milliseconds and completely lost traction on the wet grass.
Nick, the car was not relocated ... it simply bounced off the wall unable to absorb the impact. The CGT is simply not crashworthy. F1 cars routinely crash at these speeds with no injury to the driver. As it was clear at the factory, and I told Ben, the CGT is a prototype NOT a car.
When Walter Rohl said the car scared him, nobody understood that he was talking about his chances of surviving a crash. Really the CGT is a turtle compared to a full race car at 800hp and 1200lbs.
Jun 7, 2005 9:41:33 AM
Jun 7, 2005 9:48:43 AM
Jun 7, 2005 12:01:42 PM
Quote:
No skid marks as said, very disturbing.