Quote:
VKSF said:
Rossi,

I agree w/many of your points. Enzo to me appears intimidating, but not necessarily beautiful. In fact, I also think CGT is the better looking of the two cars. Unfortunately, I suspect w/supercars function (high speed stability, etc) often supersedes form....sometimes yielding questionable forms like the SLR and 612.

I think 360 is easily best looking current F car.....hopefully they don't muck it up w/430....these sketches w/a gaping smile in the front air dam concern me. 575 looks OK but to me seems to be rather bland for an F car....maybe the rumored mid-engined 575 replacement could be a more interesting car from a styling standpoint? And to me the 612 is simply an ugly car.


I agree in all your points. My dad has drove both the Enzo and CGT while I also sitting in them. He says that the Enzo is more easy to drive and also handles better and is more stabile in high speeds, but he think people will have a funnier experience because of it's removable roof.

Pictures from both drives:
Enzo:
http://www.upit.dk/files/DSCN1980.JPG
http://www.upit.dk/files/DSCN1975.JPG
http://www.upit.dk/files/DSCN1973.JPG
http://www.upit.dk/files/DSCN1951.JPG
http://www.upit.dk/files/DSCN1946.JPG

CGT:
http://www.upit.dk/files/(0)DSCN1512.JPG
http://www.upit.dk/files/DSCN1479.JPG
http://www.upit.dk/files/DSCN1491.JPG
http://www.upit.dk/files/DSCN1494.JPG
http://www.upit.dk/files/DSCN1497.JPG