Jun 22, 2013 5:29:43 PM
SciFrog: So why not two serial turbos? One small for low rpm, one big? (Funny enough when the first twin turbos came out that's what I always thought they had). Or why not 4 or more turbos in parallel?
So why not two serial turbos? One small for low rpm, one big? (Funny enough when the first twin turbos came out that's what I always thought they had).
Or why not 4 or more turbos in parallel?
The 959 had sequential turbos, but same size.
List display threaded List display flat
Post display threaded Post display flat
Show sticky Hide sticky