I don't know why the pseudo physicists on this board think that a car (Lambo) with 100hp less than a CGT and weighs about the same (within 30 pounds according to the curb weights published on the web) would out accelerate the Porsche. I've always been baffled at the acceleration differences between other Audi products and their respective competitors (BMW always manages to put a half second or more over the equivalent Audi model and it's not always due to curb weight differences).

Nonetheless, let the record stand that R&T (another 'rag' as some might say but possessing test equipment that no one on this board has) recorded a 2.1 second difference in favor of the CGT over the Gallardo and that was just to 100mph. Gallardo = 9.1 and CGT = 7.0. There's too much driveline friction & other stuff going on with the Gallardo to offer up a serious challenge to the Porsche. On wet roads however, I'm sure the AWD would be an obvious advantage.