Crown

Board: Other Sports Cars Language: English Region: Worldwide Share/Save/Bookmark Close

Forum - Thread


    Mercedes C63 AMG-AMS test

    Pretty heavy...

    Re: Mercedes C63 AMG-AMS test

    Thanks kreso.

    What's the verdict ? did they like it or dislike it ?

    Some translation please .

    Re: Mercedes C63 AMG-AMS test

    Quote:
    Ron (Houston) said:
    Thanks kreso.

    What's the verdict ? did they like it or dislike it ?

    Some translation please .



    Ron,

    They liked it but, it seems to me that this C63 is aimed at different costumers then the one that will choose new M3(ouch, not very good sentence...).

    First, autobox is good but, not very good. Second, C63 is heavy. Third, in straight line C63 is only marginally(if so..) faster then new M3. In curves or on the track it has no chance against M3. Fourth, steering seems remote control like to AMS stuff...

    IMHO C63 needs optional 030 Performance Package(19", LSD, different chassis setup) and 280km/h limiter(also an option). Only then it is an interesting car but, with full specs it is around 15000Euro more expensive then similary speced M3(also with 280km/h limit option).

    Oh, C63 engine is a monster!

    Re: Mercedes C63 AMG-AMS test

    Quote:
    KresoF1 said:
    Quote:
    Ron (Houston) said:
    Thanks kreso.

    What's the verdict ? did they like it or dislike it ?

    Some translation please .



    Ron,

    They liked it but, it seems to me that this C63 is aimed at different costumers then the one that will choose new M3(ouch, not very good sentence...).

    First, autobox is good but, not very good. Second, C63 is heavy. Third, in straight line C63 is only marginally(if so..) faster then new M3. In curves or on the track it has no chance against M3. Fourth, steering seems remote control like to AMS stuff...

    IMHO C63 needs optional 030 Performance Package(19", LSD, different chassis setup) and 280km/h limiter(also an option). Only then it is an interesting car but, with full specs it is around 15000Euro more expensive then similary speced M3(also with 280km/h limit option).

    Oh, C63 engine is a monster!



    Kreso,

    How do you compare the RS4/R8, 63 AMG and M3's V8 ? They must be pretty close but I guess the BMW's engine still has the edge.

    Re: Mercedes C63 AMG-AMS test

    R8 is a true sportscar. Others(RS4, C63 and M3) are not.

    If you like autobox(it is a must factor for huge number of so-called sportscars enthusiasts here-just look at 997 Turbo TIP fans) then you have only one choice C63.

    Otherwise it is very personal choice indeed...

    Re: Mercedes C63 AMG-AMS test

    I guess my post was not clear enough I meant enginewise.

    Re: Mercedes C63 AMG-AMS test

    Quote:
    KresoF1 said:
    First, autobox is good but, not very good.



    Did you note the gearing (last 3 gears). Very strange...

    Re: Mercedes C63 AMG-AMS test

    Thanks kreso .

    Re: Mercedes C63 AMG-AMS test

    As fast as R8. Pretty good numbers imo

    Re: Mercedes C63 AMG-AMS test

    Quote:
    MKSGR said:
    Quote:
    KresoF1 said:
    First, autobox is good but, not very good.



    Did you note the gearing (last 3 gears). Very strange...



    Yeah, three useless gears after 222 km/h... They should've left 7th gear where it was, but significantly re-spaced the other 6. I have no idea why they call it a 7-speed gearbox as even a 5-speed would do.

    Re: Mercedes C63 AMG-AMS test

    Quote:
    KresoF1 said:
    Quote:
    Ron (Houston) said:
    Thanks kreso.

    What's the verdict ? did they like it or dislike it ?

    Some translation please .



    Ron,

    They liked it but, it seems to me that this C63 is aimed at different costumers then the one that will choose new M3(ouch, not very good sentence...).




    You mean old people....like Ron

    Re: Mercedes C63 AMG-AMS test

    Quote:
    Ziggy said:
    I guess my post was not clear enough I meant enginewise.



    Sorry!

    M3 engine is excellent IMO. Amazing Laufkultur(you now what I mean here-difficult to translate to Englisch), good low end torque and progressive power delivery.

    R8 engine is having little bit less Laufkultur but, it is even better at low end torque(put it in to the 6. gear at 1200rpm-no problem at all! R8 accelerate nicelly even at low revs) and its sound is better. It is IMHO offering more charismatic character(hello Lambo!) then M3 engine.

    C63 engine is torque king. Its Laufkultur is not that good(actually M3 and R8 are way better here IMHO) and you can feel some restrain at high revs(above 6000rpm). Nevertheless, it is very, very good engine. As close as possible to good old American big blocks...

    Re: Mercedes C63 AMG-AMS test

    Quote:
    temm said:
    You mean old people....like Ron



    That's right Tim like me.

    Re: Mercedes C63 AMG-AMS test

    That's a very nice picture, the hat looks good on you
    (for the record I have met Ron, and he is not old)

    Re: Mercedes C63 AMG-AMS test

    Quote:
    KresoF1 said:
    They liked it but, it seems to me that this C63 is aimed at different costumers then the one that will choose new M3(ouch, not very good sentence...).

    First, autobox is good but, not very good. Second, C63 is heavy. Third, in straight line C63 is only marginally(if so..) faster then new M3. In curves or on the track it has no chance against M3. Fourth, steering seems remote control like to AMS stuff...

    IMHO C63 needs optional 030 Performance Package(19", LSD, different chassis setup) and 280km/h limiter(also an option). Only then it is an interesting car but, with full specs it is around 15000Euro more expensive then similary speced M3(also with 280km/h limit option).

    Oh, C63 engine is a monster!



    Thank you Kreso, some interesting statistics here.
    - It will reach the 250 kph limiter at 6k rpm in fifth gear, with 1k rpm in fifth gear and two more gears to go...
    - It's about as heavy as a BMW M5
    - Judging by this diagram it has 450 nm from idle (1k rpm), very impressive

    Re: Mercedes C63 AMG-AMS test

    Tim,

    Yes, that as WBH(aka VKSF)likes to said AMG auto"Wonderbox" is pretty strange IMHO. Gearing is good for straight line acceleration and nothing else. On the track or "twisties" C63 will be(and is) slow. This gearbox is working agianst any good(not decent!) track performance. Even if you add 030 Performance Package and 280km/h limiter(both a must for C63 IMHO)...

    Re: Mercedes C63 AMG-AMS test

    Quote:
    Crash said:
    Quote:
    MKSGR said:
    Quote:
    KresoF1 said:
    First, autobox is good but, not very good.



    Did you note the gearing (last 3 gears). Very strange...



    Yeah, three useless gears after 222 km/h... They should've left 7th gear where it was, but significantly re-spaced the other 6. I have no idea why they call it a 7-speed gearbox as even a 5-speed would do.



    BTW, C63 is shifting to 7.(!!) gear at 170km/h on the autobahn in normal mode. Go figure...

    Re: Mercedes C63 AMG-AMS test

    Quote:
    KresoF1 said:
    Tim,

    Yes, that as WBH(aka VKSF)likes to said AMG auto"Wonderbox" is pretty strange IMHO. Gearing is good for straight line acceleration and nothing else. On the track or "twisties" C63 will be(and is) slow. This gearbox is working agianst any good(not decent!) track performance. Even if you add 030 Performance Package and 280km/h limiter(both a must for C63 IMHO)...



    Even with the 030 package the first five gears are more than sufficient. I haven't a clue what led those guys to create such ratios.

    Re: Mercedes C63 AMG-AMS test

    interesting ! thanks kreso. i will choose the r8 over the m3 and the merc. anytime

    Re: Mercedes C63 AMG-AMS test

    Quote:
    Crash said:
    Quote:
    KresoF1 said:
    Tim,

    Yes, that as WBH(aka VKSF)likes to said AMG auto"Wonderbox" is pretty strange IMHO. Gearing is good for straight line acceleration and nothing else. On the track or "twisties" C63 will be(and is) slow. This gearbox is working agianst any good(not decent!) track performance. Even if you add 030 Performance Package and 280km/h limiter(both a must for C63 IMHO)...



    Even with the 030 package the first five gears are more than sufficient. I haven't a clue what led those guys to create such ratios.



    Gearbox ratios on CL63 are ever stranger...

    Re: Mercedes C63 AMG-AMS test

    Quote:
    KresoF1 said:
    Quote:
    Crash said:
    Quote:
    KresoF1 said:
    Tim,

    Yes, that as WBH(aka VKSF)likes to said AMG auto"Wonderbox" is pretty strange IMHO. Gearing is good for straight line acceleration and nothing else. On the track or "twisties" C63 will be(and is) slow. This gearbox is working agianst any good(not decent!) track performance. Even if you add 030 Performance Package and 280km/h limiter(both a must for C63 IMHO)...



    Even with the 030 package the first five gears are more than sufficient. I haven't a clue what led those guys to create such ratios.



    Gearbox ratios on CL63 are ever stranger...



    True, but that thing is a boat, designed to carry large amounts of oil in its tank .

    Re: Mercedes C63 AMG-AMS test

    "I haven't a clue what led those guys to create such ratios." - I believe it's called torque. I believe the gearbox has still issues with high torque numbers.

    And also they need better fuel consumption values. Plus marketing: we have a 7 speed gearbox! And that is more than 6!

    Probably the truth is somewhere between...

    Re: Mercedes C63 AMG-AMS test

    Quote:
    Pentium said:
    "I haven't a clue what led those guys to create such ratios." - I believe it's called torque. I believe the gearbox has still issues with high torque numbers.

    And also they need better fuel consumption values. Plus marketing: we have a 7 speed gearbox! And that is more than 6!

    Probably the truth is somewhere between...



    No, I understand that they need good fuel mileage and I find the 7th gear ratio to be just fine. It's the 5th and 6th gear ratios that leave me perplexed .

    Re: Mercedes C63 AMG-AMS test

    Quote:
    KresoF1 said:
    Quote:
    Crash said:
    Quote:
    KresoF1 said:
    Tim,

    Yes, that as WBH(aka VKSF)likes to said AMG auto"Wonderbox" is pretty strange IMHO. Gearing is good for straight line acceleration and nothing else. On the track or "twisties" C63 will be(and is) slow. This gearbox is working agianst any good(not decent!) track performance. Even if you add 030 Performance Package and 280km/h limiter(both a must for C63 IMHO)...



    Even with the 030 package the first five gears are more than sufficient. I haven't a clue what led those guys to create such ratios.



    Gearbox ratios on CL63 are ever stranger...



    Don't be so insensitive! WBH is reading this!

    Re: Mercedes C63 AMG-AMS test

    Here's the M3 result as a comparison, the C63 is 1.1 sec faster from 0-200 kph, but doesn't stand a chance in the slalom.

    Re: Mercedes C63 AMG-AMS test

    C63:

    0-100km/h 4.7 sec
    0-160km/h 10,3 sec
    0-200km/h 15,6 sec

    Slalom: 63,7 km/h
    Lane change: 130,7 km/h

    Brake distance 100-0km/h 36 meter
    Brake distance 190-0km/h 130 meter

    Tires: Pirelli P Zero

    Total rating: 4 stars out of 5


    M3:

    0-100km/h 4.9 sec
    0-160km/h 10,6 sec
    0-200km/h 16,7 sec

    Slalom: 66,7 km/h
    Lane change: 138 km/h

    Brake distance 100-0km/h 37 meter
    Brake distance 190-0km/h 127 meter

    Tires: Michelin Pilot Sport

    Total rating: 5 stars out of 5

    Re: Mercedes C63 AMG-AMS test

    I will add M3 Sport Auto test results:

    0-100km/h: 4.8s
    0-160km/h:10.2s
    0-200km/h:15.7s

    Slalom 18m: 69,2km/h

    Hockenheim: 1.14,3min

    Brake distance 100-0km/h 34,3m(11,3m/s2!!)
    Brake distance 200-0km/h 133,9km/h(11,5m/s2!!!)

    Tires: 19" Michelin Pilot Cup+
    Test car was equiped with 280km/h limiter.

    Weight: 1608kg

    As a comparison CLS 63AMG Hockenheim time is 1.18,5min...

    Re: Mercedes C63 AMG-AMS test

    Quote:
    KresoF1 said:
    Amazing Laufkultur(you now what I mean here-difficult to translate to Englisch),




    French Automotive reporters often use the word "onctuosité", which can be translated by "unctuousness" and is pretty accurate IMHO.

     
    Edit

    Forum

    Board Subject Last post Rating Views Replies
    Porsche Sticky SUN'S LAST RUN TO WILSON, WY - 991 C2S CAB LIFE, END OF AN ERA 11/24/17 2:38 AM
    JoeRockhead
    254903 1613
    Porsche Sticky OFFICIAL: New 991.2 GT3 (2017) 11/23/17 5:27 PM
    Grant
    228223 3480
    Porsche Sticky OFFICIAL: 911 GT2 RS (2017) 11/22/17 8:31 PM
    LP997
    76457 1148
    Porsche Sticky 992 (Next 911 generation 2019/2020) 11/22/17 9:35 AM
    Gnil
    55998 565
    Porsche Sticky Porsche Mission E - the future of Porsche? 11/22/17 10:22 PM
    SciFrog
    32762 316
    Porsche Sticky OFFICIAL: New 991.2 Turbo S Exclusive Series (2017) 11/23/17 7:04 PM
    EnglishManInNY
    22219 318
    Porsche Sticky OFFICIAL: New Porsche Carrera T 11/24/17 12:48 PM
    acky
    12457 225
    Porsche Sticky Next Cayenne generation approaching fast... (2018) 9/1/17 3:15 AM
    turbolite
    9221 59
    Porsche Sticky OFFICIAL: Porsche 718 GTS models (Oct. 2017) 10/24/17 12:19 PM
    amazon
    5019 19
    Porsche 918 latest news Thread Closed 11/6/17 10:43 AM
    RCA
    538539 5574
    Porsche 991 GT3 RS 11/22/17 10:44 AM
    Gnil
    446282 5791
    Porsche OFFICIAL: 991 Turbo and Turbo S 10/26/17 1:33 PM
    NSXER
    440603 4239
    Porsche OFFICIAL: 2016 Porsche Carrera 911 [991.2] Facelift 3/24/17 12:49 PM
    RCA
    249797 1382
    Porsche OFFICIAL: 911 R (2016) 11/24/17 12:21 AM
    AP911
    242477 2512
    Porsche 997 GT3 RS 4.0 3/15/17 10:40 PM
    noone1
     
     
     
     
     
    229056 737
    Porsche Cayman GT4 11/19/17 1:54 PM
    the-missile
    206836 2458
    Porsche 991 GT2 RS (2017) - Rumors, speculations and gossip Thread Closed 7/3/17 2:04 PM
    RCA
    173225 1699
    Porsche OFFICIAL: New 991.2 Turbo and Turbo S 11/13/17 4:48 PM
    RCA
    159201 1066
    Porsche The moment I've been waiting for... 11/13/17 2:32 AM
    Pilot
     
     
     
     
     
    158804 874
    Ferrari 488 GTB/GTS 11/21/17 3:35 PM
    Topspeed
    134214 1169
    McLaren McLaren on a winning streak 11/25/17 12:01 AM
    noone1
    132408 2722
    Porsche 991.2 GT3 Thread Closed 3/7/17 11:47 AM
    RCA
    122133 1651
    Porsche Collected my 997 GTS today 1/22/17 7:32 AM
    BiTurbo
     
     
     
     
     
    106373 801
    Porsche OFFICIAL: New Panamera (2016) 9/11/17 9:24 AM
    RCA
    106237 1254
    Porsche Boxster Spyder (981) 7/18/17 9:22 PM
    beltar
    105111 688
    Others Audi R8 V10 Plus (2016 model) - Review (updated Feb 13th 2017) 11/2/17 11:05 AM
    RCA
    102193 1825
    Ferrari Ferrari F12 Berlinetta / 599 GTO Successor 11/12/17 3:18 PM
    nberry
    82949 753
    Porsche OFFICIAL: 718 Boxster (2016) 10/20/17 11:17 AM
    DaveGordon
    79850 732
    Others VW caught cheating emissions tests 7/10/17 2:36 PM
    RCA
    76982 861
    Porsche 991 GTS 4/3/17 4:27 PM
    bluelines
    64720 247
    382 items found, displaying 1 to 30.